This week, H.R. 3824, the Threatened and Endangered Species Recovery Act (TESRA) was introduced by a bipartisan coalition in Congress. TESRA fixes the long-outstanding problems of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by (1) focusing on species recovery (2) providing incentives (3) increasing openness and accountability (4) strengthening scientific standards (5) creating bigger roles for state and local governments (6) protecting private property owners and (7) eliminating dysfunctional critical habitat designations.Friends, this is truly a history making event. In the thirty years since the ESA was passed, this is the first real opportunity bring needed improvements to an obviously flawed law.We have to ask ourselves; which is it going to be? Are we going to seize this opportunity, or are we going to look back years from now regretting our inaction?You may not realize how important this legislation is to your recreational access, but I do. I know several popular OHV recreation areas where anti-access groups are funding species inventories just so they can close the areas. The ESA must be reformed!We’ve held our Action Alerts on the efforts to reform the Endangered Species Act (ESA) until today out of respect for the time and effort it takes to respond to BRC’s alerts. The House Resources Committee will vote on TESRA TODAY! (Thursday, Sept. 22nd 2005). The legislation will go to the full House soon. The game is on!It is vital that you call today your Congressman in support of H.R. 3824. I can not underestimate the importance of your action on this issue. Your call could make the difference.Action Items are below &
Let’s Git ‘R Done!Brian Hawthorne
Public Lands Director
208-237-1008 ext 102Action Items:
1) Call your Congressman at (202) 225-3121. Ask your Congressman to support H.R. 3824 the Endangered Species Recovery Act.2) Ask at least five of your friends and family members to make that call too.3) Forward this Alert as widely as possible.
Background Info:Trail-based recreation has been negatively impacted by misapplication of the ESA via massive critical habitat designations and land-use restrictions related to the Northern Spotted Owl, Mojave Desert Tortoise, Red-legged Frog, Fairy Shrimp, Arroyo Toad, Kit Fox, Coho Salmon, and many other species.Don Amador, western representative for the BlueRibbon Coalition notes; “At this time, green extremists are trying to misuse the Act to restrict historic motorized access to Clam Beach in Northern California because of potential threats to the Western Snowy plover, a listed species. In many cases, these closures have little to do with recovering a species. Bottom line? Land management decisions should be science-based and that is just what the Pombo/Cardoza proposal champions. I am proud our organization is supporting this effort.”More info on the web: http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/ANALYSIS of H.R. 3824 Threatened and Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2005 (TESRA)The Threatened and Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2005 updates and improves the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by:1. Providing for the use of the best available scientific data in all decisions;2. Replacing the critical habitat program with a more integrated recovery planning process that includes the identification of specific areas that are of special value to the conservation of the species which are then given priority in recovery efforts;3. Providing for active implementation of recovery plans through implementation agreements between the Secretary and other federal agencies where the federal agency agrees to implement programs and projects identified in the recovery plans;4. Ensuring a “species-specific” approach to establishing “take” prohibitions for threatened species under Section 4(d) by making the issuance of such regulations permissive rather than mandatory, focusing such rules on the application of “take” prohibitions for such threatened species; and requiring, in most instances, a species-specific Section 4(d) rule;5. Increasing the role for States by:A. ensuring that a Governor and responsible State agencies are provided full notice and opportunity to comment on ESA decisions affecting their State,B. developing recovery plan goals for species on a state-by-state basis and improving the State cooperative agreement provisions of Section 6 to cover candidate species and other species of concern, andC. clarifying the treatment of Section 6 cooperative agreement activities under the consultation provisions of Section 7 and take prohibitions of Sections 4(d) and 9;6. Improving the Section 7 consultation process by:A. authorizing the development of alternative consultation procedures that are consistent with the existing consultation provisions,B. providing more certainty to the “jeopardy” standard by providing that jeopardy exists where “the action reasonably would be expected to significantly impede, directly or indirectly, the conservation in the long-term of the species in the wild,”C. ensuring that permit and license applicants fully participate in the consultation process, andD. clarifying that terms and conditions to avoid incidental take imposed under Section 7 should be roughly proportional to the impact of the identified incidental take;7. Establishing new incentives for voluntary conservation efforts including:A. Species Recovery Agreements which will allow landowners to enter into species recovery agreements for terms of no less than five years to carry out activities that protect and restore habitat for covered species and contribute to the recovery of listed species,B. Species Conservation Contract Agreements which establish agreements with terms of 30 years, 20 years, and 10 year for the implementation of a management plan for endangered, threatened and candidate species as well as other species comparably designated under State law,C. Authorization of technical assistance and management training to support enrollment in Species Recovery Agreements and Species Conservation Contract Agreements, andD. Establishment of a conservation grants program to promote voluntary conservation of listed species on private property and to provide financial compensation to alleviate the burden of conservation measures imposed upon private property owners;8. Codifying the No Surprises/Assurances policy for persons developing habitat conservation plans;9. Improving the habitat conservation plan procedures under Section 10 by ensuring that plans include objective, measurable goals to be achieved for the species, monitoring procedures and adaptive management provisions to respond to reasonably foreseeable changed circumstances in a species status;10. Providing certainty for private property owners by allowing landowners to request a written determination as to whether their land use activities will violate the take prohibitions of Section 9, granting the landowner incidental take coverage where the written determination is that they comply with Section 9 and giving a mechanism for compensating the private property for foregone use of his property where the determination is that the activity would violate the take prohibitions;11. Compensating private property owners for the fair market value of loss of use for foregone use of their property where the Secretary has determined that the use of that property would constitute a “take” under Section 9 and the activity is not otherwise determined a “nuisance” under principles of property and nuisance law;12. Ensuring public accountability by requiring the Secretary maintain a publicly accessible website that includes: (1) endangered and threatened species lists; (2) all final and proposed endangered and threatened species regulations issued under Section 4; (3) draft and final recovery plans; (4) the results of five year status reviews; and (5) all Reports and supporting data to Congress required under what would be the recovery planning provisions of Section 5 and the Annual Cost Analysis under Section 18; and13. Providing for annual and biennial reports to Congress on the status of listed species as well as expenditures for species recovery efforts.